<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>thinking sysadmin &#187; hpc</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andyleonard.com/tag/hpc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andyleonard.com</link>
	<description>qstat -u aleonard -s z</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:47:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Links, 6/18/2008</title>
		<link>http://andyleonard.com/2008/06/18/links-6182008/</link>
		<comments>http://andyleonard.com/2008/06/18/links-6182008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[link dump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cluster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hpc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[it]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andyleonard.com/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Cloud Computing: Is the Cloud There Yet? &#8211; A Brief History: A mostly negative look at the prospects for cloud computing.  Although the arguments it makes are fairly reasonable, the article appears to presume that cloud computing is an all-or-nothing proposal, not a tool for only some tasks.  Also odd &#8211; &#8220;Many routine [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.keystonesandrivets.com/kar/2008/06/cloud-computing.html">Cloud Computing: Is the Cloud There Yet? &#8211; A Brief History</a>: A mostly negative look at the prospects for cloud computing.  Although the arguments it makes are fairly reasonable, the article appears to presume that cloud computing is an all-or-nothing proposal, not a tool for only some tasks.  Also odd &#8211; &#8220;Many routine tasks which are not processor intensive and time critical are the most likely candidates to be migrated to cloud computing&#8221; seems wrong (think Sun&#8217;s network.com, or how SmugMug uses EC2).  Further, the article seems to ignore that <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/21/who-are-the-biggest-users-of-amazon-web-services-its-not-startups/">big pharma and financial institutions are the largest users of AWS</a>.  Still, all in all, a perspective worth considering.  (Originally seen at <a href="http://insidehpc.com/2008/06/17/what-came-before-the-cloud-and-why-those-failures-matter-now/">InsideHPC.com</a>.)</li>
<li><a href="http://scalability.org/?p=628">What he said! &#8211; scalability.org</a>: Joe Landman on &#8220;IT clusters. They are not HPC clusters by any stretch of the imagination. They don’t really work well. Some things sorta-kinda work. Lots of things don’t or cannot. You have some interesting failure modes.&#8221;  I&#8217;ve seen exactly what he&#8217;s talking about from the biosciences arm of a large hardware/services company, where they sold something that was high margin, poorly configured, had a lousy interconnect, and, yes, was running RHEL.  The article&#8217;s use of &#8220;IT&#8221; as a disparaging term was also interesting.  (Also seen at <a href="http://insidehpc.com/2008/06/17/when-is-a-cluster-not-an-hpc-cluster/">InsideHPC</a>.)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.blocksandfiles.co.uk/article/5622">EMC flashing CLARiiON?</a> &#8211; Rumor that flash from EMC is slowly starting to march down-market.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andyleonard.com/2008/06/18/links-6182008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
